
Share
6th February 2018
03:07pm GMT

The complainant stated that she is personally disappointed and disgusted by the presenter's comments and the lack of response from Newstalk. The complainant states that it took until Saturday lunchtime before Newstalk issued an apology, but only after 24 hours of uproar.
Having considered the broadcast and the submissions from the complainant and having had regard to the Broadcasting Act 2009, Section 48(b)(offence and harm) and the BAI Code of Programme Standards (Principle 2 - Importance of Context), the BAI Members decided to uphold the complaint.
“In considering this complaint, the Committee acknowledged that the broadcaster subsequently undertook remedial action and has accepted the substance and validity of the complaint,” the BAI report stated.
“It also noted that the presenter explicitly stated that he does not condone rape. However, the broadcaster had a responsibility to take greater care to prevent the possibility of undue offence and harm, including taking timely corrective action where content is likely to have caused offence.
“The Committee was of the view that the broadcaster had failed to take corrective action in a timely fashion, action which may have ameliorated the undue offence caused. Given this and given the content of the programme, the Committee has decided to uphold the complaint.”
You can read the full details of the complaint in the Broadcasting Complaint Decisions February 2018 report here.Explore more on these topics: