
Share
6th December 2015
09:31am GMT

On Wednesday, a terrible thing happened in real life. 14 people were killed and 21 injured in a mass shooting at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino. It was America's deadliest gun attack since Sandy Hook in 2012.
It was, of course, in the public interest for news outlets to cover developments. But as is so often the case in this age of 24-hour live updates, fact was the victim of haste.
Police identified married couple Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik as the perpetrators of the horrific attack, and they were both killed during an exchange of gunfire.
However, various media outlets including The Daily Beast incorrectly identified the male suspect's brother, Syed Raheel Farook, as one of two killers. The innocent man they have made a target for vigilante attacks is a US Navy veteran with a Global War on Terrorism Service Medal.
Although such mistakes are irresponsible and incredibly harmful, they do not come as a surprise. Errors are always writ large and repeated, whilst apologies are whispered and easily missed. What jarred even for this age of exceptional b*llocks was what happened a few days later.
On Friday morning, a throng of reporters - and what looked like members of the public - were shown swarming into the apartment of the deceased suspects. Armed with mics, cameras and lighting equipment, they stormed in like impatient shoppers on Black Friday.
This happened mid-investigation, and it was televised live. Professional journalists, with scant regard for ethics or morality, rummaged around the personal effects of Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik with alarming insouciance. It could have been a school jumble sale.
We were told that the landlord opened the doors of the macabre museum to the fourth estate, as apparently was his prerogative as property owner. Not so, according to both the landlord, who claims the press simply barged in, and the law, which does not permit what happened.
https://twitter.com/DaveMontero/status/672871870354493440?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
But what does that matter when there's ratings to consider and hits to be had? The situation may differ somewhat from what is depicted in Nightcrawler, but it is creeping very close to that territory and in some ways it is worse. Louis Bloom was a lone ghoul; these are major networks.
https://twitter.com/MaximEristavi/status/672838381626392576
The biggest news channels actually aired their reporters prowling around a cot and rearranging an infant's toys for a more 'poignant' shot. MSNBC were forced to apologise after they showed images of photographs and ID cards of the innocent relatives of the dead suspects.
It may all seem a little irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Why worry about the privacy and rights of those identified as murderers. People actually died - their families in mourning right now. Who gives a sh*t about Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik?
It's not them we should worry about - it's us. The salacious coverage was for our benefit. It was seen as fulfilling a want that was ours. Even if at no point during the initial reports did anyone think, 'I'd really like have a snoop around that dead couple's bathroom.'
https://twitter.com/kath_krueger/status/672827067168399360
What's next? Someone dragging a body to more convenient spot? A Sky journalist rifling through an air crash victim's suitcase? A psychopath tipping off their favourite news channel about a bloody act they're about to perform? It's f*cked up. It's already seriously f*cked up.
None of this creepy voyeurism is normal, and none of it should be excused in the name of 'news'.Explore more on these topics:

Article | Joe.ie
news