
News
Share
Published 12:59 14 Mar 2018 GMT
Updated 09:36 16 Mar 2018 GMT

In court, the defendant contested the charges, claiming that the dogs were owned by his uncle who was in hospital and that he was not in control of the dog but merely feeding it.
But, when asked by Judge Desmond Zaidan, Mr McEvoy conceded that he was aware that the dog was in poor health from “around Christmas”, approximately two months prior to its removal. Judge Zaidan asked him: “How could you have not done anything about it?”
Mr McEvoy was convicted on two offences under sections 12(1)(a) and 12(1)(b) of the Animal Health and Welfare Act 2013 and acquitted on two further counts under sections 11 and 13. Judge Zaidan imposed a fine of €500 on each count and ordered Mr McEvoy to pay €1500 in state costs and €584 ISPCA expenses.
Inspector Casement commented: “When you take on the responsibility of caring for an animal you must address any issue that may arise. A failure to seek veterinary attention for this dog when it was clearly needed resulted in it being subjected to prolonged suffering.”
You can find more information about the ISPCA’s work, make a donation, or report animal cruelty in confidence on the ISPCA website.Explore more on these topics: