
News
Share
Published 15:01 21 Dec 2016 GMT

The complainant stated that any opposing viewpoint on the issue was treated in a cursory manner and that it was unfair for the presenter to fail to point out that Mr. and Mrs. Edwards were part of a campaigning group, Terminations for Medical Reasons.
RTÉ, for their part, responded to the complainant saying that the interview was a piece reacting to a story of the day, which was the UN Human Rights Committee ruling on fatal foetal abnormalities.
Furthermore, RTÉ refuted the allegation in the complaint that opposition to the UN ruling and its support was “cursory,” stating that, in fact, in his introduction the presenter quoted from the submission on behalf of the Irish State to the UNHRC, which can be read in full in the BAI report here.
Having considered all of the information available to them, the BAI committee came to the conclusion that the broadcast did not comply with the fairness, objectivity and impartiality requirements of the Broadcasting Act 2009. Accordingly, the complaint was upheld.
As a result, the Ray D’Arcy show will be issued with a warning and if the matter is not remedied to the BAI’s satisfaction, the matter may ultimately result in the Compliance Committee determining that an investigation is warranted and the potential application of formal sanctions.Explore more on these topics: