
Movies & TV
Share
Published 16:10 31 Jan 2017 GMT

Three of the complaints, meanwhile, also made reference to the Sydney Rose, Brianna Parkins, who called for a repeal of the eighth amendment.
One complainant stated that “such blatant support for political change on this issue, constituted unwarranted interference in the internal affairs of the Irish democracy”.
All five complaints about the Rose of Tralee, which can be explored in detail here, were rejected by the BAI.
In regard to complaints about the North Carolina Rose, while the BAI noted that her comments were irreverent and humorous and that some audience members may have been offended, they said that participants in a programme have the right to their views and the right to frame their own experiences in their own words.
The committee added that they did not believe that her comments (or those of the presenter) were of a nature that they would cause widespread offence and could be considered to stigmatise, support or condone discrimination against people on the basis of their religion.
In regard to complaints about the Sydney Rose, meanwhile, the BAI considered her comment to be the expression of a personal opinion made in the context of a light entertainment interview whose focus was on her character and her interests. The committee noted that the presenter did not specifically elicit her views on the topic of Ireland’s abortion laws nor did he pursue this topic further.
While the BAI’s news and current affairs code may apply to content in a programme that is not itself a news and current affairs programme, the committee was of the view that the remarks of the participant did not constitute news and current affairs but were rather brief personal opinions given in the context of her participation in a light entertainment contest.
Images via Facebook/Rose of Tralee International FestivalExplore more on these topics:

The JOE Film Club Quiz: Week 91
movies tv